解剖学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 652-657.doi: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2016.05.012

• 解剖学 • 上一篇    下一篇

比格犬上颌窦的应用解剖

游冬冬1 戴霖霖2 陈永辉3 林兆楠1 付小明4 吴东1* 黄文秀1*   

  1. 1. 福建医科大学附属口腔医院, 福州 350002; 2. 中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院, 广州 510120; 3. 福建省漳州市医院口腔科, 福建 漳州 363000; 4. 重庆医科大学附属口腔医院, 重庆 401147

  • 收稿日期:2016-02-15 修回日期:2016-04-21 出版日期:2016-10-06 发布日期:2016-10-06
  • 通讯作者: 吴东,黄文秀 E-mail:wudong510_5@hotmail.com
  • 基金资助:

    福建省科技厅重点项目

Applied anatomy of the maxillary sinus of the beagle dog

YOU Dong-dong1 DAI Lin-lin2 CHEN Yong-hui3 LIN Zhao-nan1 FU Xiao-ming4 WU Dong 1* HUANG Wen-xiu 1*   

  1. 1. Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University,Fuzhou 350002,China; 2. Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510120,China; 3. Department of Stomatology, Zhangzhou Municipal Hospital of Fujian Province, Fujian Zhangzhou 363000, China; 4. Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing 401147,China
  • Received:2016-02-15 Revised:2016-04-21 Online:2016-10-06 Published:2016-10-06
  • Contact: WU Dong,HUANG Wen-xiu E-mail:wudong510_5@hotmail.com

摘要:

目的 探讨比格犬上颌窦正常解剖,为与上颌窦有关的动物实验提供解剖学依据。 方法 收集16个比格犬上颌窦,利用锥形束投照计算机重组断层影像(CBCT)扫描,并完成局部解剖,详细观察上颌窦形态、位置、容积、自然窦口位置及与周围组织的毗邻关系。另购买2只健康成年比格犬,利用CBCT确定上颌窦窦底,经腭侧开窗,显露软组织,夹取该位点黏膜行组织学检查,光学显微镜下验证所夹取黏膜是否为上颌窦黏膜。 结果 比格犬上颌窦形状略似锥形,前部较窄,后部宽大,位于上颌第3前磨牙与第1磨牙之间的腭侧,四周均有骨壁包绕。于第4前磨牙远中牙尖腭侧,距腭中缝约17~18mm处可见上颌窦最低点。同一个体双侧对比,差异无统计学意义。 结论 比格犬双侧上颌窦无明显差异,有利于上颌窦相关研究进行随机分组;窦腔内无明显骨嵴或分隔,降低窦黏膜穿孔的危险;行上颌窦外提升时,结合CBCT于上颌窦最低点经腭侧骨板开窗是最佳的术式。

关键词: 上颌窦, 放射测量, 局部解剖, 苏木素-伊红染色, 锥形束投照计算机重组断层影像, 比格犬

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the anatomy of beagle dog’s maxillary sinus, and provide the anatomic data for animal study. Methods Sixteen maxillary sinuses of the beagle dog were collected and scanned by cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT). The morphology, position, volume, ostium of maxillary sinus as well as its relation to the adjacent tissues were examined. Two other health adult beagle dogs were used for histological examination in which after the preoprerational CBCT examination.A bone block in hard palate was surgicall lifted and the living mucosa tissue was sampled for histological examination. Results It was observed from CBCT that the shape of the maxillary sinus was nearly taper type which was stenosis in the front,spacious at the back. Maxillary sinus was located in the palate side between the maxillary third premolar and the maxillary first molar surrounded with bony. The maxillary sinus floor was in the palate side of the maxillary forth premolar, and was about 17-18mm distant from midpalatal suture. There was no obvious statistic difference in both side of same individual. Conclusion The characteristics of the bilateral maxillary sinus have no significant difference, and are conducive to make the randomly grouping design for maxillary sinus’s study; The rates of membrane perforation is reduced as for there is no bone crest or antral septa in sinus cavity. Sinus floor elevation in the right space by use of anatomic mark point in CBCT is able to accurately display the complete image of the maxillary sinus, and liftting bone block in hard palate of the the maxillary sinus floor is safer and more accurate, and more minimally invasive.

Key words: Maxillary sinus, Radiometry, Topography, HE staining, Cone beam computed tomography, Beagle dog