Acta Anatomica Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (2): 284-288.doi: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2021.02.019

• Histology,Embryology and Developmental Biology • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol compared with other three ovulation hyperstimulation protocols

LI Jian-hua1 JIAO Ting-ting1 WANG Jian-ye1 LI Chang-shan1 DONG Pan1  CHEN Xi2* ZHANG Shui-wen1*    

  1. 1.Center of Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, the Seventh Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100700, China; 2.Center for Reproductive Medicine,Peking University Second Hospital,Beijing 100044,China
  • Received:2020-03-27 Revised:2020-05-11 Online:2021-04-06 Published:2021-04-06
  • Contact: CHEN Xi;ZHANG Shui-wen E-mail:zhang180308@163.com

Abstract:

Objective  To analyze the clinical outcomes of progestin primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) compared with the other three different controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocols in fresh embryo transfer (ET) and frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles.    Methods  A total of 430 oocyte pickup cycles and 272 FET cycles were retrospectively analyzed. Number of oocytes retrieved, laboratory indexes and pregnancy outcome of FET were compared.    Results  The mean oocytes retrieved (11.1±7.3), fertilization rate (85.6%), cleavage rate (95.1%) and excellent embryo rate (20.2%) as well as transplantable embryo rate (4.5±3.1) of the PPOS group did not show significant differences compared with the other 3 subgroups (all P<0.05) in fresh cycle. As for pregnancy outcomes in FET cycles, no statistically significant differences were observed among the four groups in embryo implantation rate (26.2%), clinical pregnancy rate (63.0%) and abortion rate (11.8%) (all P<0.05).However, embryo implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate was higher in PPOS group compared with the other groups. Conclusion   Conclusion  Compared with the other three ovulation stimulation programme, PPOS might be used as a new alternative for controlled ovulation stimulation protocols.

Key words:

CLC Number: