[1] Yuan L, Gao LB. Anatomy and biomechanics of the pelvis[J]. Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2001, 3(2): 69-70. (in Chinese)
原林, 高梁斌. 骨盆的解剖和生物力学 [J]. 中国创伤骨科杂志, 2001, 3(2): 69-70.
[2] Liu P, Liao KD, Chen ChL. Comparative study of three-dimensional reconstruction and measurement of the pelvis based on MRI and CT[J]. Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2015, 31(6): 439-443. (in Chinese)
刘萍, 廖科丹, 陈春林, 等. 基于MRI与CT骨盆三维重建与测量的对比研究 [J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2015, 31(6): 439443.
[3] Ji XX, Wang F, Wang QG. Research advances in applied anatomy of the pelvis based on digital three dimensional measurement[J]. Chinese Journal of Trauma, 2011, 27(4): 313-315. (in Chinese)
纪晓希, 汪方, 王秋根. 基于数字化三维测量的骨盆应用解剖学研究进展 [J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2011, 27(4): 313-315.
[4] Zhang LCh, Zhang LH, Xu M, et al. Measurements of the posterior acetabular surface and design of a new anatomical locking plate for acetabular fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2014, 16(4): 290-294. (in Chinese)
张里程, 张立海, 许猛, 等. 髋臼后表面解剖形态测量及新型解剖锁定钢板的设计 [J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2014, 16(4): 290-294.
[5] Arand C, Wagner D, Richards RG, et al. 3D statistical model of the pelvic ring -a CT-based statistical evaluation of anatomical variation [J]. J Anat, 2019, 234(3): 376-383.
[6] Audenaert EA, Pattyn C, Steenackers G, et al. Statistical shape modeling of skeletal anatomy for sex discrimination: their training size, sexual dimorphism, and asymmetry [J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2019, 7(11): 302-313.
[7] Wang HK, Zhang N, Sun XB, et al. Construction and application of a web-based three-dimensional organ model visualization system including Chinese anatomical variations[J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica, 2019, 50(2): 220-227. (in Chinese)
王洪凯, 张楠, 孙孝邦, 等. 包含中国人群解剖学差异的Web端三维器官模型可视化系统的构建及应用 [J]. 解剖学报, 2019, 50(2): 220-227.
[8] Ambellan F, Lamecker H, von Tycowicz C, et al. Statistical Shape Models: Understanding and Mastering Variation in Anatomy [M]. Switzerland Cham: Springer, 2019: 67-84.
[9] Arbabi S, Seevinck P, Weinans H, et al. Statistical shape model of the talus bone morphology: a comparison between impinged and nonimpinged ankles[J]. J Orthop Res, 2023, 41(1): 183-195.
[10] Luthi M, Gerig T, Jud C, et al. Gaussian process morphable models [J]. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 2018, 40(8): 1860-1873.
[11] Liu P, Han H, Du Y, et al. Deep learning to segment pelvic bones: large-scale CT datasets and baseline models [J]. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg, 2021, 16(5): 749-756.
[12] Su XY, Zhao Z, Zhao JX, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of the curvature of the femoral canal in 426 Chinese femurs [J]. Biomed Res Int, 2015, 2015:1-8.
[13] Zhao W, Guo Y, Xu C, et al. Distal humerus morphological analysis of chinese individuals: a statistical shape modeling approach [J]. Orthop Surg, 2022, 14(10): 2730-2740.
[14] Ahrend MD, Noser H, Shanmugam R, et al. Development of generic Asian pelvic bone models using CT-based 3D statistical modelling [J]. J Orthop Transl, 2020, 20(1): 100-106.
[15] Fischer B, Mitteroecker P. Allometry and sexual dimorphism in the human pelvis [J]. Anat Rec, 2017, 300(4): 698-705.
[16] Handrich K, Kamer L, Mayo K, et al. Asymmetry of the pelvic ring evaluated by CT-based 3D statistical modeling [J]. J Anat, 2021, 238(5): 1225-1232.
[17] Meng HY, Wang AY, Xu WJ, et al. Digital anatomical parameters of retrograde screw placement for superior pubic ramus fractures[J]. Jiefangjun Yixueyuan Xuebao, 2018, 39(6): 520-522. (in Chinese)
孟昊业, 汪爱媛, 许文静, 等. 逆行螺钉置入固定骨盆耻骨上支骨折的数字解剖学参数[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2018, 39(6): 520-522.
[18] Arand C, Wagner D, Richards RG, et al. Anatomical evaluation of the transpubic screw corridor based on a 3D statistical model of the pelvic ring [J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 16677.
|