[1] Fan X, Zheng P, Zhang YY, Hou ZT. Dynamic fixation versus static fixation intreatment effectiveness and safety for distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries: asystematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Orthop Surg, 2019, 11(6): 923-931.
[2]Van Heest TJ, Lafferty PM. Injuries to the ankle syndesmosis [J]. Bone Joint Surg Am, 2014, 96(7): 603-613.
[3]Zhong Q, Zhan J, Yang H, et al. A new method of nice knot elastic fixation for distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury [J]. Orthop Surg, 2023, 15(3): 785-792.
[4]Dattani R, Patnaik S, Kantak A, et al. Injuries to the tibiofibular syndesmosis [J]. Bone Joint Surg Br, 2008, 90(4): 405-410.
[5]Petruccelli R, Bisaccia M, Rinonapoli G, et al. Tubular vs profile plate in peroneal or bimalleolar fractures: is there a real difference in skin complication? A retrospective study in three level I trauma center [J]. Med Arch, 2017, 71(4): 265-269.
[6]Connors JC, Grossman JP, Zulauf EE. Syndesmotic ligament allograft reconstruction for treatment of chronic diastasis [J]. Foot Ankle Surg, 2020, 59(4): 835-840.
[7]Fujimoto S, Teramoto A, Anzai K. Tibial plafond attachment of the posterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament: a cadaveric study [J]. Foot Ankle Orthop, 2020, 5(4): 1-5.
[8]Ebraheim NA, Lu J, Yang H. The fibular incisure of the tibia on CT scan: a cadaver study [J]. Foot Ankle Int, 1998, 19(5): 318-321.
[9]Mousavian A,Shakoor D,Hafezi-Nejad N. Tibiofibular syndesmosis in asymptomatic ankles: initial kinematic analysis using four-dimensional CT [J]. Clin Radiol, 2019, 74(7): 571-578.
[10]Malhotra K, Welck M, Cullen N. The effects of weight bearing on the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: a study comparing weight bearing-CT with conventional CT[J]. Foot Ankle Surg, 2019, 25(4): 511-516.
[11]Del Balso C, Hamam AW, Chohan MBY. Anatomic repair vs closed reduction of the syndesmosis [J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2021, 42(7): 877-885.
[12]Jiang WH,Dong YL,Zhang Ch,et al.Anatomy and clinical significance of the lower end connection of adult tibia and fibula [J]. Acta Anatomica Sinica, 2013, 44 (2): 249-252. (in Chinese)
姜文辉,董伊隆,张程, 等. 成人胫腓骨下端连接的解剖及其临床意义 [J]. 解剖学报, 2013, 44(2): 249-252.
[13]Liu Q, Lin B, Guo Z. Shapes of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis are associated with risk of recurrent lateral ankle sprains [J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 6244-6251.
[14]Kubik JF, Rollick NC, Bear J. Assessment of malreduction standards for the syndesmosis in bilateral CT scans of uninjured ankles [J]. Bone Joint J, 2021, 103(1): 178-183.
[15]Hagemeijer NC, Chang SH, Abdelaziz ME. Range of normal and abnormal syndesmotic measurements using weightbearing CT [J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2019, 40(12): 1430-1437.
[16]Ebraheim NA, Taser F, Shafiq Q. Anatomical evaluation and clinical importance of the tibiofibular syndesmosis ligaments [J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 2006, 28(2): 142-149.
[17]Yu MY, Sun Q, Yu XG. Measurement of anatomic parameters of syndesmotibiofibular syndesmosis by multi-slice spiral CT [J]. Chinese Journal of Anatomy and Clinical Science, 2017, 6(22): 192-196. (in Chinese)
禹铭杨, 孙强, 于晓光. 下胫腓联合解剖参数的多层螺旋CT测量 [J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2017, 6(22): 192-196.
[18]Liu GT, Ryan E, Gustafson E. Three-dimensional computed tomographic characterization of normal anatomic morphology and variations of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis [J]. Foot Ankle Surg, 2018, 57(6): 1130-1136.
[19]Taser F, Toker S, Kilin?oA?lu V. Evaluation of morphometric characteristics of the fibular incisura on dry bones [J]. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi, 2009, 20(1): 52-58.
[20]Mavi A, Yildirim H, Gunes H. The fibular incisura of the tibia with recurrent sprained ankle on magnetic resonance imaging [J]. Saudi Med J, 2002, 23(7): 845-849.
|