5种动物肠内胆管解剖组织结构差异的比较

doi:10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2015.02.017

解剖学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 244-250.doi: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2015.02.017

• 组织学胚胎学发育生物学 • 上一篇下一篇

5种动物肠内胆管解剖组织结构差异的比较

翟羽佳崔燕*

甘肃农业大学动物医学院，兰州 730070

收稿日期:2014-09-28 修回日期:2014-12-10 出版日期:2015-04-06 发布日期:2015-04-06
通讯作者: 崔燕 E-mail:cuiyan369@sina.com
基金资助:
冷应激因子CIRP和HSP70与牦牛高寒低氧环境的适应机制

Comparison of anatomic and histologic differences of the intestinal bile duct among five animals

ZHAI Yu-jia CUI Yan*

College of Veterinary Medicine, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070，China

Received:2014-09-28 Revised:2014-12-10 Online:2015-04-06 Published:2015-04-06
Contact: CUI Yan E-mail:cuiyan369@sina.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的探讨豚鼠、兔、犬、猫、牦牛肠内胆管解剖组织结构的差异。方法运用大体解剖和石蜡切片，通过HE和阿利新蓝-过碘酸雪夫(AB-PAS)染色，对这5种动物（每种选取5只）的肠内胆管进行解剖组织学观察和测量。结果豚鼠、兔、牦牛的肠内胆管均由胆管单独形成，犬、猫的肠内胆管由胆管、胰管共同形成，豚鼠、兔、猫、牦牛都存在膨大的Vater壶腹，犬无Vater壶腹。豚鼠、兔、牦牛的Vater壶腹由肠内胆管膨大形成，此处肠内胆管黏膜层增厚，腺体大量增多，形成大量黏膜瓣，肌层逐渐萎缩；猫的Vater壶腹有Oddi括约肌结构，并在胆胰管分流处形成壶腹瓣膜。肠内胆管腺的性质不同，豚鼠、犬、猫为浆液腺，兔为黏液腺，牦牛为混合腺。兔胆管开口特殊，位于胃幽门部，其他动物位于十二指肠；豚鼠的大乳头为半球形，兔、犬为扁椭球形，猫、牦牛为长梭形。
结论豚鼠、兔、犬、猫、牦牛肠内胆管最主要的结构差异是肠内胆管的形成不同和Vater壶腹的区别；其次黏膜层内胆管腺性质不同。胆管开口位置和形成的大乳头形状不同。

关键词: 胆囊, 肠内胆管, 解剖结构, 组织结构, 差异, 阿利新蓝-过碘酸雪夫染色, 哺乳动物

Abstract:

Objective To study anatomical and histological structure differences of the intestinal bile duct among guinea pig, rabbit, canine, feline and yak. Methods The instestinal bile ducts from five kinds of animals (5 amimals each) were studied by the gross anatomy and paraffin section. HE and AB-PAS staining were performed to observe and measure the anatomical and histological structural characteristics. Results The intestinal bile ducts were formed by the bile duct in guinea pig, rabbit and yak, and by the bile duct and pancreatic duct in canine and feline. The Vater ampulla was found in guinea pig, rabbit, feline and yak, but not in canine.The Vater ampulla was formed by the bile duct enlarging in guinea pig , rabbit and yak. The bile duct structure mucous layer was thickened, had a significant increase in the gland and formed a large number of mucosal flap. The musclular layer shranked gradually. Only felines had the sphincter of Qddi and formed ampulla valvular. The property of the intestinal bile duct gland was different. The intestinal bile duct gland was the serous gland in guinea pig, canine and feline, the mucous gland in rabbit and the glands in yak. Rabbit bile duct opening was located in the gastric pyloric part, and the opening of the other animals was in the duodenum. In guinea pig, the shape of large papilla was semicircular, in rabbit and canine was oblate ellipsoid, in feline and yak was long spindle. Conclusion The most important morphological structure distinctions of the intestinal bile duct among 5 kinds of the animals were different in the formation of intestinal bile duct, Vater ampulla, the property of intestinal bile duct gland, and the shape and position of large papilla.

Key words: Gall bladder, Intestinal bile duct, Anatomical structure, Histological structure, Difference, AB-PAS staining, Mammal

翟羽佳崔燕*. 5种动物肠内胆管解剖组织结构差异的比较[J]. 解剖学报, 2015, 46(2): 244-250.

ZHAI Yu-jia CUI Yan*. Comparison of anatomic and histologic differences of the intestinal bile duct among five animals[J]. AAS, 2015, 46(2): 244-250.

参考文献

［1］Lan YJ, Tian FZh. Applied anatomy of the biliary-enteric coupling portion［J］. Journal of Regional Anatomy and Operative Surgery, 2001, 10(1):65-66. (in Chinese)
兰阳军,田伏洲.胆肠结合部的应用解剖［J］.中国局解手术学杂志,2001,10(1):65-66.
［2］Liu JM, Yan QH, Lu YJ. Theoretical Methods and Applications of Histopathology Staining［M］. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 1983:80-82. (in Chinese)
刘介眉,严庆汉,路英杰.病理组织染色的理论方法和应用［M］.北京:人民卫生出版社,1983:80-82.
［3］Dyce KM, Sack WO, Wensing CJG. Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy［M］. 4th ed.Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 2010:139,447.
［4］Jo Ann Eurell, Brian L. Frappier.Dellmann’s Textbook of Veterinary Histology［M］. 6th ed.Philadelphia: Wiley-Blackwell, 2007: 206. 
［5］Cho WK, Boyer JL. Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide is a potent regulator of bile secretion from rat cholangiocytes［J］. Gastroenterology, 1999, 117(2): 420-428.
［6］Sand J, Tainio H, Nordback I. Neuropeptides in pig sphincter of Oddi, bile duct, gallbladder, and duodenum［J］.Dig Dis Sci, 1993, 38(4):694-700.
［7］Kimmo Kysola, Leena Rechardt. Electron microscopic observations on the innervation of the sphincter of oddi in the dog［J］. Cell Tissue Res, 1975, 161 (2): 167-176.
［8］Avisse C, Flament JB, Delattre JF. Ampulla of Vater. Anatomic, embryologic, and surgical aspects［J］. Surg Clin North Am, 2000, 80(1):201-212.
［9］Chen DB, Zhou DM, Yang KQ, et al. Morphological feature of sphincter of Oddi and its clinical significance［J］. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2001, 19(3):228-230. (in Chinese)
陈道邦,周德明,杨开清,等.Oddi括约肌形态特征及其意义［J］.中国临床解剖学杂志,2001,19(3):228-230.
［10］Kher K, Guelrud M. Normal sphincter of oddi motor function［J］. Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 2004, 6(2):163-168.
［11］Xu N, Tang QW, Zhang ZY, et al. Anatomy of liver and pancreatic function ampulla of membrane［J］. Medical Information, 2010, 24(1):1-2. (in Chinese)
徐宁,唐全伟,张作英,等.肝胰壶腹隔膜解剖学研究及功能探讨［J］.医学信息,2010,24(1):1-2.
［12］Li DX, Tian FZh, Li H, et al. Morphological characters of the ampulla septum and its clinical significance［J］. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 1999, 17(3):252-253. (in Chinese)
黎冬暄,田伏洲,李红,等.壶腹隔膜的形态及其生理意义［J］.中国临床解剖学杂志,1999,17(3):252-253.
［13］Flati G, Flati D, Porowska B, et al. Surgical anatomy of the papilla of Vater and biliopancreatic ducts［J］. Am Surg, 1994,60(9):712-720.
［14］Andrews CJ, Andrews WH. The relation between structure and function of bile ducts in man, some laboratory animals and the adelie penguin［J］. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci, 1979, 64(2):61-67.
［15］Sfairi A, Farah A. An abnormality of the biliopancreatic junction associated with an ectopic anastomosis of the common bile duct into 3rd section of the duodenum［J］. Ann Gastroenterol Hepatol (Paris), 1996, 31(6):34-348.
［16］Hada R. A hydraulic behavior of the mucosal structure of the intramural common bile duct［J］. Gastroenterol Jpn, 1978, 13(6):433-441.

[1]	洪晓敏李三强崔钦奕郑润月杨孟利罗仁利李前辉 . 酒精性肝纤维化核因子κB信号通路与性别的差异 [J]. 解剖学报, 2024, 55(1): 55-61.
[2]	廉祎李咏兰于会新 . 贵州苗族与湘西苗族体成分分析[J]. 解剖学报, 2023, 54(2): 231-237.
[3]	黄婷李欣兰蕙温有锋. 哈萨克族舌运动类型及其相互关系[J]. 解剖学报, 2022, 53(6): 802-807.
[4]	隋杰李欣温有锋张文虔李强于婷. 内蒙古与新疆达斡尔族成人皮脂发育比较[J]. 解剖学报, 2022, 53(1): 120-125.
[5]	吴佳姿孙畅文少卿谭婧泽. 汉族人群肢体测量表型的地区差异[J]. 解剖学报, 2021, 52(5): 803-811.
[6]	席焕久刘大华李文慧刘莹莹. 骨健康差异分析[J]. 解剖学报, 2021, 52(4): 662-669.
[7]	史卓李家慧高静董艳莉任甫文普帅 . 小鼠心肌肥厚枢纽基因的筛选与鉴定[J]. 解剖学报, 2021, 52(3): 391-397.
[8]	李紫君魏偏偏孙畅文少卿谭婧泽. 汉族鼻部观察类形态特征的地区性差异[J]. 解剖学报, 2020, 51(4): 605-612.
[9]	刘中娇窦龙涛庄振刘玲周永维刘曼李晶张红梅. 乳头状甲状腺癌差异表达基因的筛选及生存分析[J]. 解剖学报, 2020, 51(1): 51-57.
[10]	李新田蜜彭冰何莉莉 . 黏蛋白16基因通过磷酸肌醇3-激酶/蛋白激酶B通路调节胆囊癌细胞活力和迁移[J]. 解剖学报, 2019, 50(5): 613-619.
[11]	王凤产 . 太行山猕猴掌面肤纹嵴线的走向[J]. 解剖学报, 2018, 49(5): 671-676.
[12]	李海军樊晓霞方璐瑜戴成萍. 下颌骨若干测量性状的时代间比较[J]. 解剖学报, 2018, 49(4): 535-539.
[13]	赵巧雅孙雪婧王玲玲王涛只陈秋生林金杏 . 铜对斑马鱼鳃的损伤及其作用机制[J]. 解剖学报, 2018, 49(3): 367-373.
[14]	刘晓东王艺儒吕金阳徐晓燕张致祎王鑫吕广明. 皮质脊髓束损伤后胶质细胞激活相关microRNA的筛选与验证[J]. 解剖学报, 2018, 49(1): 14-19.
[15]	苟陶然李重阳欧锐朱嘉宁俞诗源*. 海洛因对小鼠视网膜结构和抗氧化物酶的影响[J]. 解剖学报, 2017, 48(6): 663-668.

5种动物肠内胆管解剖组织结构差异的比较

Comparison of anatomic and histologic differences of the intestinal bile duct among five animals

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价