解剖学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (5): 627-632.doi: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2019.05.014

• 解剖学 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于三维测量的人体表面积计算公式的比较

刘国华1* 盛迪晔2   

  1. 1.安徽体育运动职业技术学院体育教育管理系,合肥 230051; 2.香港大学心理学系,香港 999077
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-24 修回日期:2019-06-23 出版日期:2019-10-06 发布日期:2019-12-10
  • 通讯作者: 刘国华 E-mail:1352734983@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省高校质量工程

Comparison of human body surface area calculation formulas with three-dimensional anthropometry

LIU Guo-hua 1* SHENG Di-ye2   

  1. 1.Department of Physical Education and Management, Anhui Professional Technical Institute Of Athletics,Hefei 230001,China; 2.Department of Psychology, the University of Hongkong,Hongkong 999077, China
  • Received:2019-05-24 Revised:2019-06-23 Online:2019-10-06 Published:2019-12-10
  • Contact: LIU Guo-hua E-mail:1352734983@qq.com

摘要:

目的 探讨基于三维测量的人体表面积(BSA)计算公式在实际应用时的差异性。 方法 选取1249名大学生(男性639人,女性610人)2018年体质健康测试数据,运用单因素方差分析、相关分析和Bland-Altman分析等方法,研究4种基于三维测量的人体BSA计算公式的差异性,并与基于传统测量的胡咏梅公式进行比较。结果 各公式的BSA计算值间均存在统计学差异(P<0.01),但有着高度相关性(r≥0.985)。基于传统测量的胡咏梅公式的男、女性BSA计算值均高于4种三维测量公式的计算值,男性BSA值高7.32%~12.11%,女性BSA值高5.53%~11.72%。男、女性4种三维测量公式的Bland-Altman分析显示,ChiYuang Yu公式的95%一致性(1.021~1.034)最好。 结论 4种基于三维测量的人体BSA计算公式中,ChiYuang Yu公式相对最适合中国成年男、女性的BSA估算。

关键词: 三维测量, 体表面积, 计算公式, Bland-Altman分析,

Abstract:

Objective To observe the difference of the human body surface area (BSA) formula based on three-dimensional measurement in practical application. Methods The data of 1249 college students (639 males, 610 females) from physical health examination in 2018 were selected. Using the one-way factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA), correlation analysis and Bland-Altman comparative analysis, comparisons between the BSA values using four BSA calculation formulas based on three-dimensional measurement and with the traditional formula measurement by Yongmei Hu’s were made as well. Results There were significant statistical differenes between the BSA values of the formulas (P<0.01), while the correlation between them (r≥0.985) were also rather high. Results from Hu Yong-mei’s formula were higher than the other four 3D formulas in both genders, with the BSA of males 7.32%-12.11% higher than the mean while female BSA values were 5.53%-11.72% above the average. It has been shown from the Bland-Altman analysis that the formula from ChiYuang Yu had the highest consistency score (95%CI 1.021-1.034) among the selected four 3D measurement formulas. Conclusion Within the four BSA formulas based on 3D measurement principle, ChiYuang Yu’s formula is relatively more suitable to estimate the BSA values of both Chinese males and females.

Key words: Three-dimensional anthropometry, Body surface area, Calculation formula, Comparative analysis of Bland-Altman, Human