解剖学报

解剖学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (4): 501-505.doi: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2019.04.016

• 解剖学 • 上一篇    下一篇

四柱支撑钢板与桥接解剖钢板治疗Rüedi-Allgower Ⅲ型Pilon骨折的疗效比较

刘国雄1* 马翰斐1 肖柳斌1 赖俊成1 刘兰2   

  1. 1.深圳市龙华区人民医院骨科，广东 深圳 518109; 2.广东省深圳市龙华区人民医院药剂科，广东 深圳 518109
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-07 修回日期:2019-04-24 出版日期:2019-08-06 发布日期:2019-08-06
  • 通讯作者: 刘国雄 E-mail:wan0965831@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    2012年深圳市科技计划项目

Comparison of clinical effect between bridge locking anatomical plate with supported plate based four column in type Ⅲ Rüedi-Allgower Pilon fracture

LIU Guo-xiong 1* MA Han-fei1 XIAO Liu-bin1 LAI Jun-cheng1 LIU Lan2   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Shenzhen Longhua District People’s Hospital, Guangdong Shenzhen 518109, China;

    2. Department of Pharmaceutical, Longhua District People’s Hospital of Shenzhen, Guangdong Shenzhen 518109, China

  • Received:2019-03-07 Revised:2019-04-24 Online:2019-08-06 Published:2019-08-06
  • Contact: LIU Guo-xiong E-mail:wan0965831@163.com

PDF

摘要：

目的 比较四柱支撑钢板与桥接解剖钢板治疗Rüedi-Allgower Ⅲ型Pilon骨折的临床疗效。 方法 对52例接受治疗的Rüedi-Allgower Ⅲ型Pilon患者按照不同固定方式分为观察组（“四柱”支撑钢板，28例）和对照组（桥接解剖钢板，24例）。评估手术时间、失血量、引流量、愈合时间、完全负重时间、功能与疼痛评分等指标。 结果 两组患者手术时间、失血量、引流量相比，差异无统计学意义（t=0.37, P>0.05；t=0.71,P>0.05；t=0.24, P>0.05）。观察组完全负重时间、骨折愈合时间方面明显低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（t=1.56, P＜0.05；t=2.43, P＜0.05）。术后1个月，两组患者美国足踝外科协会（AOFAS）踝-后足评分系统评分和视觉模拟评分法（VAS）评分相比，差异无统计学意义（t=0.67, P>0.05；t=0.46, P>0.05）。术后3、6个月起，观察组患者AOFAS评分和VAS评分明显优于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。两组患者在复位质量Burwell-Charnley评分方面、并发症方面无明显差异（P＞0.05）。结论 四柱支撑钢板治疗Rüedi-Allgower Ⅲ型Pilon骨折能够有效提高患者生活质量，值得临床广泛推广。

关键词: 四柱理论, Pilon骨折, 钢板内固定, 解剖学, 人

Abstract:

Objective To explore the clinical effect between bridge locking anatomical plate with supported plate based four column in type Ⅲ Rüedi-Allgower Pilon fracture.Methods Retrospective study was performed on the clinical data of type Ⅲ Rüedi-Allgower Pilon fracture undergoing surgery. Patients were divided into two groups according to internal fixation. Some parameters including operation time, blood loss, and drainage, healing time, full burden time, functional score and pain score were analyzed. Results There was no significant difference between the operation time, blood loss and drainage between the two groups（t=0.37, P>0.05；t=0.71,P>0.05；t=0.24, P>0.05). The healing time and full burden time of experimental group was lower than control group significantly (t=1.56,P＜0.05；t=2.43, P＜0.05). For American Orthopaedic Food and Ankle Society(AOFAS) score and visual analogue score(VAS) in postoperative 1 month, there was no significant difference between the two groups. For AOFAS score and VAS score in experimental group was lower than control group after 3 months (P＜0.05). There was no significant difference between two groups in reduction quality Burwell-Charnley score and complication between two groups. Conclusion Supported plate based four column could improve the life quality of patietns with Pilon fracture, which is worth to recommed in clinical application.

Key words: Four column theary, Pilon fracture, Plate internal fixation, Anatomy, Human